Rafsanjani’s Death Reshuffles the Political Deck in Iran
The public funeral of former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, on January 10, 2017, led to the outpouring in Tehran of public calls for the release of opposition leaders held under house arrest and political prisoners in a resurgence of support for reformist issues that have been harshly suppressed in Iran for the last decade.
The events since Rafsanjani’s death on January 8 have revealed not only the sharp fractures within Iranian society between hardliners and reformists, but also unhealed wounds dating back to the violent repression of the citizenry after protests against the result of the disputed 2009 presidential election rocked the country.
Large crowds chanting slogans calling for the release of opposition leaders Mir Hossein Mousavi, Mehdi Karroubi, and Zahra Rahnavard–who have been under house arrest since 2011–were met by crowds of hardline supporters chanting counter slogans.
The polarization of Iranian society was reflected in the reaction to Rafsanjani’s death among Iran’s political elite. Conservative Member of Parliament Ali Motahari tweeted that peoples’ chants demanding the release of the opposition leaders show that the government must soon resolve the issue. Hardliners meanwhile publicly rejoiced: “With Hashemi-Rafsanjani’s death, the last barrier protecting reformists has been eliminated … and has resulted in the complete harmony of political power,” tweeted conservative journalist Bahman Hedayati.
It is ironic that Rafsanjani emerged—in his later years and now in death—as a galvanizing force for reformists in Iran. He never fully embraced progressive ideas or became an advocate for human rights, but many now fear his death will embolden political hardliners and reinforce authoritarian tendencies within the Islamic Republic.
#Rafsanjani funeral: Ppl demand release of hunger-striking political prisoners “Shariati & Sadeghi must be released” https://t.co/0rvHODBnlC pic.twitter.com/kK9urSZSIC
— IranHumanRights.org (@ICHRI) January 10, 2017
“You can easily see fear in some of the people’s reactions,” wrote prominent reformist journalist Jila Baniyaghoob on Twitter on January 8, after the 82-year-old former president was pronounced dead from a massive heart attack.
Beyond the current reactions to Rafsanjani’s death is the question of the political effect of the departure of one of the main architects of the 1979 revolution, who in recent years came to serve as a buffer against conflicts between hardline and moderate forces.
Evolution of a Revolutionary Architect
During the revolution’s first two decades—when he was at the height of his power and influence as president (1989-97)—Rafsanjani allowed political crackdowns to occur under his watch, including the assassinations of political dissidents inside and outside Iran.
Throughout the 1990s, during Rafsanjani’s presidential terms, the Intelligence Ministry launched a campaign of intimidation and persecution against political dissidents. In 1996, intelligence agents almost succeeded in killing a group of Iranian writers and intellectuals after forcing a bus the group was travelling in to swerve into a valley. The abduction of journalist Faraj Sarkohi that year by the Intelligence Ministry and suspicious deaths of dissident literary figures including Ali Akbar Saeedi Sirjani, Ahmad Miralaie, and Ahmad Tafazoli in the 90s—which many held the ministry accountable for—also took place under Rafsanjani’s watch.
However, shortly after his presidency ended, Rafsanjani surprised Iranians in 1997 when a speech he gave—ostensibly to dispel fears of vote-tampering—ultimately led to the election of reformist presidential candidate Mohammad Khatami. The little-known cleric was running against conservative candidate Ali Akbar Nategh-Nouri, who, as the establishment’s favored candidate, had seemed like a shoo-in.
Rafsanjani’s public criticism of the government’s violent repression of pro-democracy figures following the disputed 2009 presidential election hastened his fall from the favor of his former hardline allies, including the Islamic Republic’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, and reflected his move toward the center.
“If they don’t end [the protests], they will be responsible for the consequences and chaos,” warned Khamenei on June 29, 2009, after millions of Iranians took to the streets chanting “where is my vote?” in response to the presidential election a week earlier, which brought conservative hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a second presidential term.
Khamenei’s comment was seen as a green light for security forces to violently suppress the protests in a campaign that continued for months.
Rafsanjani and Khamenei once stood together as key leaders of the revolution, but less than a month after Khamenei’s comment, Rafsanjani publicly sided with the protesters. “A large section of the people have doubts about the result of the election,” he said on July 17, 2009. “We must alleviate those doubts.”
Soon after, Rafsanjani was forced to step down from his chairmanship of the Assembly of Experts, a powerful clerical body that selects the country’s supreme leader, although he remained a member.
More recently, Rafsanjani remained silent when an audio file was posted in August 2016 by the son of the once-successor to Iran’s first supreme leader, Hosseinali Montazeri, in which Montazeri described the mass executions of dissidents in the summer of 1988 as “the greatest crime in the Islamic Republic of Iran” while holding revolutionary leader Ruhollah Khomeini and some of his closest allies responsible.
Declining Influence
As of 2010, the once powerful Rafsanjani seemed resigned to his declining influence. “If I relay your request to the authorities, I’m not sure I’ll get a positive response,” he told the family of political prisoners’ who had asked him to put in a good word for their loved ones with Khamenei. “It might have the opposite effect.”
But rather than receding into the shadows, Rafsanjani began advocating the release of Mousavi, Rahnavard and Karroubi.
“If anything happens to those under house arrest, it would leave a permanent stain on the state,” he said during a 2013 meeting with Khamenei, according to the Karroubi-affiliated Saham News website.
Most recently, Rafsanjani spoke out against the disqualification of Hassan Khomeini— the moderate grandson of revolutionary leader Ruhollah Khomeini—from running in the February 2016 election for the Assembly of Experts.
“You have disqualified a distinguished man, a man who carried the spirit of the late Imam Khomeini. Who are you?” he said, addressing the hardline Council of Guardians, which vets political candidates. “Who gave you the right to take over and pass judgment on Parliament, the government and others? Who gave you permission to have all the guns and media? Who gave you permission to control Friday prayers and IRIB (state TV)? Who gave you these rights?”
Yet even as a sidelined former president with most of his titles stripped of him, Rafsanjani remained as one among a handful of senior Iranian officials who could publicly question and criticize state policies and actions without being imprisoned—even though two of his children were imprisoned, one for her political dissent.
Political Vacuum
Rafsanjani was instrumental in the selection process of Khamenei as supreme leader of the Islamic Republic in 1989, when the co-revolutionaries were close political allies. As their differing visions for the future of the Islamic Republic imposed a growing rift between them, Khamenei worked to consolidate his position, while Rafsanjani the pragmatist called for the implementation of a constitutional body to lessen the possibility of authoritarian rule.
However, his advocacy for the multi-member Leadership Council, which could be appointed by the Assembly of Experts to fill the role of the one-man supreme leader, proved unsuccessful, and the body was removed from the Constitution via a 1989 amendment.
Rafsanjani’s death removes a potential balancing force from the conservative Assembly of Experts, which will select Iran’s supreme leader following Khamenei’s death. It has also left a political vacuum in the country, with unclear implications for the moderate and reformist forces who relied on Rafsanjani’s moderating powers, especially President Rouhani, who he helped to elect.
*This article was updated with additional information on Wednesday, January 12, 2017 at 1:51 a.m.